Reply to Alyosha’s Post

I replied to Alyosha’s post on the previous blog post here Ed Bain’s Work Sheet  (where you can also see Alyosha’s questions) however to be able to add links and/or illustrations for some of these explanations I had to make this a blog post.  This post also includes my play at Santa Anita today. Let em roll at the 1/4 poll……. Ed

I think you made a good choice Alyosha in ordering the stats.  All that experience that you’ve had betting will come in to play particularly in the 4-race form cycle.  Both of those guys you mentioned Ken Massa and Ron Cox offer good products.  Discipline is hard to understand in racing because of the emotions that all players run through during a race.  You know you’ve found discipline when you don’t have a bet and everyone else is excited but you. You can bet or pass and it’s the passing that creates discipline.

1). Do the stats include all wet days?

2) Do you treat a wet day like a dry one and play regardless?

I don’t buy the form so I don’t get the current Tomlinson’s however, I have an old Tomlinson book that still has many of the sires still dropping foals so I do use Tomlinson to help me some what.  In my stats, all the stats are combined, off track, wet track, turf track, fast track and when you click on the Layoff, Claim, Debut and Won Last race you can view statistics on how many races he had on the turf and what his numbers are.

I do have a good understanding of off track pedigree, but by nature I am very cautious about betting into pedigree that I don’t know is good on an off track.  So I do end up passing many bets that are on wet or muddy tracks and when I do, many still hit the exacta. Just because I pass does not mean they won’t win. When I do have the Tomlinsons I look for a 400 number.  So I demand a very high hit rate from the Tomlinson and I demand the same thing from my statistics.  400 Tomlinsons, 40% in the exacta.

3) Is it possible to recover prior days of PP in order to research. I believe I can copy and paste the link into an email to myself, but only track by track, so a long process. Any other way?

My database makes over a million calculations daily so yesterday’s races are in today’s stats.  Also there’s nothing wrong with tedious work in racing.  This is how I ended up designing and playing the 4 race form cycle through trial and error.  That is the scientific way.

The only other way is through my database which I do offer on a monthly subscription. Data Export Tool

4). Bigger question: I will try to lay out the method as I understand it thusfar and ask for feedback.
JT stats in the book I’ve ordered are for NY and SCal circuits, so it would seem that the focus would be there. The PP stats have jockey with trainer stats, which will sometimes be 4+30, but they don’t show you who is the trainer’s go to rider. So in order to find a key horse, I would begin? 1) by looking at the Non Fav trainer possibilities for the day–and focus on the NY and Scal circuits first. Then 2) look at the JT stats to narrow down by eliminating combos that are not using one of the preferred riders. 3) Now look at the more detailed stats–eg at that track. 4)Pay close attention to where in the cycle the trainer is and see if this is his preferred moment–eg a spike.

The Jockey-Trainer Exacta Report is absolutely crucial to betting.  I’m amazed that there are no Jockey-Trainer reports offered.  It’s almost like they’re invisible.  Any player who uses this report will become a better player that day.  I would encourage everyone to use this and use it first in order.  The next series of questions you’re asking is actually how I handicap and the best answer I can give you is in this blog article

The reason is, it’s how I start.  And I start with pen and paper.  I make out a 3 deep grid of what the favorites number is in every race and his odds and that sets up the day to start handicapping. This gives me a visual.  What I’m looking for is 3/1 Morning Line favorite.  It’s the only favorite I place as a key bet.

The second bet in that article is actually 3/1, non-favorite and these two plays are my favorite plays to make.  I usually get one or two bets per day at 3/1.  I would follow that article and I would use these plays.  I would adopt the 3/1 favorite and the non-favorite as the first thing you look for in statistics.  This will give you plays to look for.  This is the advantage of statistics.  You can find the same plays to bet over and over.  However you have to start at the beginning which is with pen and paper and laying out that grid.

It’s very important for you to have a starting point.  All players I know open to Race 1, horse 1 and handicap horse by horse, race by race and hope they see something along the way.  That is what makes horse racing tedious.  When you’re handicapping for a play, something you know has a hit rate, in this case 3/1 for me is 25%, I cash 1 out of every 4.  When you’re handicapping a go-to play like 3/1, the only thing tedious is waiting for the race to come up and being patient.  This 3/1 is triggered by a Jockey-Trainer combination.  Does he have a go-to jockey on him.  The Jockey-Trainer stats could be played as an approach by themselves.

I have one 3/1 Morning Line play today.  It’s at Santa Anita in Race 3, the 4 horse Pundy.  It’s a Irad Ortiz Jr and Peter Miller.  Irad Ortiz has zero races in sprints at Santa Anita with Peter Miller.  Irad is replacing Flavien Prat.  Flavien is one of Peter Miller’s go-to jockeys 33-15-45% in sprints at Santa Anita in the Exacta.  Miller on 2nd after a Layoff in a sprint at Santa Anita on his favorites is 11-9-81%.  Irad Ortiz zero percent.  I would have made this play if Flavien Prat was up.  He is a very good jockey, under rated jockey. I’m sure he hated giving up that 3/1 morning line favorite to Irad Ortiz.  Moving to one of the top 5 jockey’s in the Country, Irad Ortiz is not a bad jockey switch either.

5). How you find horses that are not 4+30 to include in the exacta is one of my questions.

That is a good question.  Just as I mention above, you have to have a starting point.  The race can’t run until all the horses are loaded in the gate and it’s the same with handicapping.  I start with pen and paper, I have a work sheet and I make a copy of the entries program.  Even though I have an elaborate website that tells me everything that I want to know, what I like to do is layer it in by hand.  First the grid, then I enter all the jockey-trainer combinations on top of the Jockey’s name.  There is no bet that I make that does not have a go-to jockey on him other than a shipper like Irad Ortiz.  Once I have who the real players are for me then I go to my stats.  I click on the appropriate stat, the detail page comes up and on the left side of this page has all the details on how this trainer performed by track, class, distance, surface and field size.  What I am looking for in the stats is I immediately click on today’s track, Santa Anita and see how all this trainers races separate.  As an example like Peter Miller on Lay 2 Sprint favorites and I write down these stats like this L2S SA Fav 11-9-81% on top of the trainers name.  It would be easier if I just would roll through my website, pick a horse here and there to play and hope for the best but what it really takes is hard work.  It may be mental and it may be slow and tedious.  I must like mental, slow tedious work.  It’s what makes us a grinder.

6). Finally, other than NY and SCal tracks, we have a wealth of data but not the JT stats. Should we play very selectively demanding more from the stats—eg, start with non Fav list, then focus on the jockey trainer stat in the PP and spikes?

What sets up my handicapping for statistics is a 40% exacta rate.  That is extremely high.  So it gets you to stats that are playable and that you’re betting into a trainer who has his go-to rider on him.  It’s the absolute key to being selective.  You will only want to bet races that have a 40% exacta rate.  So yes, you need to be highly selective.  You have the experience and you also understand how to handle selectivity.

Pattern playing the 4-race form cycle is an untapped statistical resource.  Spike plays, either or plays, I play patterns of all types in this 4-race form cycle.  As a player you’ll see some immediately.  Some will look easy to play and some races there will be nothing there in the patterns.  Pattern playing is a visual approach.  I use it all the time for fillers in the Exacta.  Once I have a key horse, I separate my playing by patterns.  First Layoffs, Claims, Debuts, Won Last Race.  Pattern playing reminds me of Star Trek opening statement “Where no man has gone before”.  The 4-race form cycle forces you to look at cycles and you will see good jockey-trainer stats on bad cycles or just the opposite.

I can produce any jockey-trainer report for every track.  It’s the same price.  It will take me a couple of weeks to get it done but if you need one just tell me.

Jockey-Trainer Exacta Report

Save 10% in the Book Store today on All publications by entering coupon code Save10 on checkout.

Ed Bain’s Handicapping Work Sheet

After I posted Ed’s Work Sheet I decided to take this picture of Ed’s Brain.  Wasn’t surprised to see this.  Makes a lot of sense.

From Susan:
Just wanted to share this.
When Ed’s talking about handicapping he thinks everyone knows what he’s talking about when this is actually what he is talking about

Ed Bains Worksheet when he Handicaps the Races

4 Race Form Cycle

I track the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th race after a Layoff, Claim, Debut and Won last Race. Every bet I make is from these 4 races. The last bet I made with speed was in 1992.

When a trainer lays a horse off and returns him to the track, most want to schedule races every 14 to 21 days.  A 4 race cycle takes around 2 to 3 months when things are going good.

There are 86 entries on Saturday at Aqueduct.
List of 86 entries at Aqueduct for Saturday 12/16/17 Courtesy of

25 are moving through the Layoff 4 race form cycle which is 29% of all runners.

22 are moving through the Debut 4 race form cycle.
There are two Maiden races.

17 are in the Won Last Race form cycle.

17 are traveling through the Claim 4 race form cycle.

There were 25 Layoff stats at Aqueduct. These produced a spike play in Race 5 where the number 4 horse, trained by Abigail Adsit is on 1st after a layoff in a sprint race is  6%,  31%, 0% 0% and in today’s race she is on a 2nd after a layoff in a sprint where Abigail is 19-6-31%. Her horse’s Morning Line (M/L) is 15/1 and my stats show she is all or nothing. All 6 from the 19 tries were wins.

There are 22 Debut horses moving through their 4 race form cycle. In Race 6 the number 13 horse is a Linda Rice trained horse. Rice’s Debut percentages of 13% 34% 28% and 29%. Her Debut 2 Sprint numbers at Aqueduct are 84-29 35%. Her horse’s M/L is 8/1.

17 Won their Last Race. In Aqueduct race 8 the number 5 horse is trained by Ollie Figgins III. His percentages on Won Last Race are 139-28-20%. He is 21-2-9% in stakes races, 0 for 5 at six furlongs and no stakes wins outside of Charlestown. Ollie is a Charlestown trainer. His horse’s M/L is 8/5.

There are 17 Claim Stats.  In Aqueduct Race 9 the number 1 horses trainer is Rudy Rodriguez who has a Claim 1 Route stat that is in his 4 race form cycle. His numbers are 25%, 15%, 23%, and claim 4 is 24%. His stats on Claim 1 Route are 92-23-25% at Aqueduct. Rudy Rod has claimed 46 horses at Aqueduct which is half of the horses he claimed.  He is an Aqueduct claiming trainer. His M/L is 6/1.


Results From the 4 plays today,

Linda Race in Race 6 scratched her horse.

In Race 4 Abigail Adsit hit her spike play, 2nd after a layoff in a sprint, paid $14.40 to win, and $2 exacta paid $61.00.

In Race 8, the 5 horse Oillie Figgins horse from Charlestown ran out.

Race 9, the 1 horse A Rudy Rodriguez Claim 1 Route at Aqueduct won and paid $8.00 to win and $2 exacta paid $95.50.

12,000 Who Win 23,000 Who Lose

I know three things that will happen in my life; death, taxes and a favorite in every race.

There are around 35,000 races carded in the U. S. each year and there was a favorite in every one of them. Around 30% will be favorites that will hit for the grandstand the railbirds and all us exacta players.

Around 12,000 who were favorites will win and around 23,000 who were favorites will lose. 30% is 5/2 odds and pays $7. The favorite has an actual payout of $4.80 that is actual odds of 7/5 that requires a 43% actual win rate. The favorite is an underlay.

As a player I know you can hit the favorite, cash and lose money as you are winning. Because I am betting against a very determined group of players who pound the exacta with the favorite in every race every day, month after month year after year, I know the favorite is going to get me in a bunch of races. I only need to cash on one out of every four instead of the crowd having to hit four out of ten that is required to hit the $4.80 payout to have a chance of knocking me out of an exacta. These chances are reduced because the favorite has an actual win rate of 30%.

If I bet this race I have to know if the favorite has to be part of my exacta. Can I can go with the favorite based on odds or against the favorite and accept the results.

Here is how I determine who is an actual favorite and who is not and who is a bettable favorite and who is not.  I handicap with pen, paper and the computer and I handicap two circuits New York and Southern California.

Los Alamitos Race Course is currently open. They replaced the 7 furlong bull ring track with a mile oval. Los Alamitos has only been racing on this mile oval track for a few months. Since my stats are to small to apply what I look for in 3/1 odds as the favorite, I wait until Santa Anita opens in a couple of weeks where the numbers swing my way for more bets on the 3/1 morning line (M/L) favorite.

There are smaller fields in Southern California so that has an impact on the line maker. He has to set lower and lower odds on the favorite to compensate for field size. However, Saturday normally has larger fields.

So today I’ll pass Southern California and just list On the paper Aqueduct, the Track, the race, the saddle cloth number of the favorite and the M/L

Aqueduct Saturday 12/9/2017

R 1 # 2- 1/1  GT      R 4 # 6-3/1         R 7 #10-5/2

R 2 # 9 -3/1             R 5 # 5-5/2         R 8 # 1-9/5

R 3 # 1-1A- 9/5       R 6 # 7- 8/5       R 9 # 13-2/1

Aqueducts list of ten favorites tell me there are three races the line maker believes the horse is superior to his opponents and three races are at an in between odds level 2/1 and 5/2. Two races have M/L odds of 3/1. That is about as high an odds a line maker is willing to give a favorite. Normally 3/1 is the third favorite making 3/1 a contender not a favorite.

I target 3/1 as a bet and this layout gives me a visual on how the odds are set for favorites on a race card. All I need is a jockey/ trainer statistic that will show me the correct race to bet a 3/1 M/L favorite. I know the three low priced favorites will not make it into any exacta bet because I can expect these three to drop three to five more odds levels by post time.

The bet is a key horse exacta based on the jockey trainer stats. It is the first bet I look for every day and is the most interesting to handicap. Most players go to the Racing Form and start handicapping Aqueduct race 1 horse 1. My race 1 is race 2 to look for first because the favorite has odds of 3/1. This is the way I set up a routine to find the same bet over and over. When I add in exacta betting statistics, the way to handicap changes. I take advantage of percentages, to know when to bet or when to pass. 3/1 Morning Line favorites offers cashing bets and hitting consistency. I have a 25% cash rate for this play.

After making the above list I open my track specific jockey-trainer exacta report separated by sprint and route and fill in the stats on each favorite at Aqueduct. I am looking for favorites that the trainer has his go to jockey on his horse. I can bet or pass if the trainer does not have his go to jockey on him. Beside the odds I write GT for Go To and an S if the trainer is switching to his go to jockey and that is the best 3/1 favorite to bet.

Aqueduct Races 2 and 4 have a 3/1 favorite.  In race 2 Joe Bravo is in the irons for trainer Rudy Rodriguez. In the past five years Rudy Rodriguez has not given Joe Bravo any sprinters at Aqueduct. Rudy Rod’s four go to jockeys at Aqueduct in exacta sprints are Irad Ortiz 234-119-51%, Jose Ortiz has 29-16-55%, Cornelio Velasquez 59-25-42% and Junior Alvarado 32-16-50%. I will pass race 2. Joe Bravo is a very good jockey and can still win though I’ll wait for Rudy Rodriguez and one of these 4 go to jockeys.

Joe Bravo has no sprint tries at AQU for trainer Rudy Rod
Ed Bain’s Jockey-Trainer Exacta report stats shows C Velazquez as one of trainer Rudy Rodriguez’s go-to jockeys

Race 4 Maiden Claim sprint has a 3/1 favorite at Aqueduct with jockey Kendrick Caramouche riding for trainer Jeremiah Englehart.  In sprint races Caramouche-Englehart have 28-6-21% exacta stats. Jeremiah Englehart’s go to jockeys are Angel Arroyo 21-9-43%, Jose Ortiz 47-19-40% and Irad Ortiz 18-8-42%. I will wait for one of these three go to jockeys to be on board to bet. Debut 1 Stats for Englehart at AQU in Sprints

Jeremiah Englehart horse is a Debut 1. For Englehart’s first time starter sprinters at Aqueduct he has a record of 16-1-8%. Another reason to pass even if he had his go-to jockey on him.

Today I will not have a bet on 3/1 M/L favorites. I would have to find bets that would go against the favorite. So I will be betting into those 23,000 favorites who lose and I will not be able to take advantage of those 12,000 who win. Maybe Sunday.

The Ortiz Brothers What Are the Odds

By Ed Bain

On January 20th 2013 while Irad Ortiz had been racing for about 8 months in New York and his brother Jose, who was still a bug boy had been at the Big A for less than a month, the brothers won 7 races in a row. It was 37 degrees at Aqueduct and 83 in Puerto Rico where Irad and Jose grew up. The total 1st place purse money on these 7 races was $177,000. From these purses Irad and Jose collected their 10% commission for a total of $17,700 for one day.

Because the Ortiz brothers are from a tropical climate and Aqueduct is a winter track I decided to look at their stats during these cold rainy days at Aqueduct in the winter and the spring.  I need to equate statistics to odds for me to understand what talent looks like in a figure so I put their exacta rate percentage to odds on all their statistics.

On snowy days Irad had a total of 22 races, he hit the exacta in 11 races for a 50% exacta hit rate in the snow.  That’s odds of even money 1/1. On snowy days Jose went to post in 16 races, he hit the exacta 4 times for a 25% hit rate. That is exacta odds of 3/1.

On rainy days Irad raced 51 times, he hit the exacta 21 for a 41% exacta hit rate. That is exacta odds of 6/5.  Jose had 44 races in the rain with 16 exacta hits for 36% strike rate.  That is odds of 9/5 in the exacta.

On showery days Irad stats are 107-44-41% exacta hit rate that is odds of 9/5 and Jose stats are 87-33-38% an exacta hit rate that is odds of 8/5.

On cloudy days Irad had 608 races, he hit 269 exactas for a 44% hit rate that is exacta odds of 6/5. Jose stats on cloudy days are 667-294-44% for exacta odds of 6/5.

The move from a warm weather track to a cold weather track had no effect on Irad and Jose’s ability to race during the cold miserable racing days at Aqueduct even though they grew up in a tropical setting. It is 40 to 50 degrees colder in New York compared to Puerto Rico in the winter. These stats tell me that race riding is as much mental as physical. Irad and Jose came to Aqueduct to dominate the jockey standings and they have.

Irad has went to post 684 times as the favorite, he hit the exacta 418 times for a 61% hit rate that is 3/5 exacta odds. Jose raced as the favorite 482 times, he hit the exacta in 302 races for a favorite exacta hit of 63% also an odds rate is 3/5.

If you like to bet the exacta with the favorite the brothers raced as the favorite a total of 1,166 times and hit the exacta 720 times for a 62% hit rate.  This means you can cash on a lot of exactas even when you make a mistake.

Since 2013 at Aqueduct racetrack jockey Irad Ortiz Jr. had 1,872 races, he has been in the exacta 805 times for a 43% exacta hit rate. Also at Aqueduct his brother jockey Jose Ortiz had 1,687 races and he has been in the exacta 709 times for a 42% exacta hit rate. These are forehead slapping amazingly consistent exacta hit rate betting statistics for the Ortiz brothers.

The exacta pools at Aqueduct can range from $100,000 to $350,000 per race and these big pools offer betting value.  I bet the exacta and have statistics in my Jockey-Trainer Exacta report.  These are for the number of win/place horses in the exacta with the hits awarded to the jockey.

I always bet a Key horse in the exacta for first and second and then use several filler horses with my key horse for the bet. I never bet a three or four horse exacta box.  I apply odds to each of the Ortiz brother’s statistics and all the sub-sets that are part of their over all numbers. The reason is I can relate the odds on the toteboard with the percentages the Ortiz brothers produce on their stats and the odds give me an understanding how good Irad and Jose are to bet in the exacta.

I target 3/1 odds to bet and my favorite odds play is 3/1 which has a 25% win rate, 1 hit out of 4. Many trainers have around a 10% or more place rate. If you add in this 10% it makes that 25% win rate a 35% win/place rate for the exacta which is odds of 9/5. Irad has 215 races at 3/1, 83 hit and produced a 39% exacta hit rate and 8/5 odds. Jose had 218 races and 91 exacta’s for a 42% hit rate and 7/5 odds. Combined Irad and Jose went to post 433 times and cashed the exacta in 174 races with 3/1 odds and produced a percentage that is 40%. This is making 3/1 an overlay.  These are very big profitable percentages to bet into. I know because I have cashed on a bunch of the Ortiz brothers 3/1 odds level.

I know most wins come from 6/1 and down so I separated by 6/1 and down and 7/1 and up, a long shot stat.

Irad had 275 races at 7/1 and up and 47 exacta hits for 17% strike rate which is a 5/1. Jose had 372 races, 62 exactas hits which is also a 5/1 odds line on his 7/1 shots and higher. Combined Irad and Jose had 647 longshot races and 109 exactas a 17% exacta hit rate.  The average odds on these 7/1 and up horses is 13/1. The brothers have a 5/1 hit rate with 13/1 longshots

If you want to bet longshots bet into Irad and Jose’s 17% exacta rate on 7/1 and up odds level and you can make big scores. I know a few players who will tell you they would take a 10% hit rate and accept the 9 losers for every ten to hit a big exacta or trifecta. However, with a 10% hit rate you will have 20 to 25 losers in a row followed by a hit and then lose another 10 to 15 bets. Like race riding, betting is also a mental sport. It is better to know before you bet what your odds are on longshots. Betting 17% which is odds of 5/1 will cut into this kind of losing streak, will keep you in the game longer and minimize your expectations which makes the mental part of betting easier to understand.

Irad and Jose have made it very easy to bet their long shot runners.

I took the favorite out and separated by the 2nd favorite to 6/1 who are the contenders.

Irad had 898 races, he hit 339 exacta’s for a 38% exacta rate which equals 8/5 exacta odds. Jose stats for his 2nd favorite to 6/1 odds are 831-341- 41% which is 7/5 exacta odds. The 2nd favorite to 6/1 are contenders for the brothers.  All total they went to post 1,729 races were in the exacta 680 times for a 39% hit rate which is a 9/5 exacta strike rate. Most of my bets on Irad and Jose are at this odds level.  They hit regularly and consistently with this odds level.

These two jockey’s Irad Ortiz Jr and his brother Jose Ortiz are not lightweights. They are heavy weight contenders for the best jockeys in New York and in the U. S. A.

The future for Irad and Jose is with 2 year olds. Where they get on them as baby’s and race the best ones in Stakes races.

Since 2013 Irad rode 132 2 year olds, he hit on 47 for a 36% exacta rate and an odds level of 9/5.  Jose raced 136 times and hit 60 exacta’s for a 44% hit rate and 6/5 odds.
They will find there way to the Graded Stakes races with theses kind of statistics on 2 year olds and they will ride them to the Kentucky Derby and in the Triple Crown races.

Hall of fame jockey Angel Cordero who is also from Puerto Rico is Irad and Jose’s idol.  It would not surprise me if they consulted with Cordero about racing in New York and he told them “When the big stables go south to Gulfstream and the big time jocks go with them, you go to Aqueduct during winter racing. Establish your business with the hard knockers who stay at Aqueduct for the winter meet and the big outfits will give you big horses because of your talent to ride and race.” And if Angel Cordero told Irad and Jose to do that, it is exactly what they did. They have produced spectacular betting statistics from Aqueduct.

The question is why did I only produce stats from Aqueduct races?  The answer is this is where they decided to start their career that cold winter day on Jan 20th 2013 and this is where they are racing today.

The brothers unparalleled run towards being the best jockeys in horse racing is on the track today so we can all see this brotherly racing phenomenon. Their numbers say they are there. As a horse better I have never seen numbers for two jockeys like Irad and Jose and what they produce on the track day after day is a head shaker and they are brothers.

From 2012 to today combined Irad and Jose Ortiz have 3,559 races at Aqueduct produced 1,514 exacta’s a 43% exacta hit rate and a 7/5 strike rate. Irad and Jose came from Puerto Rico to Aqueduct in the middle of the cold wet winter and did not see snow or the cold. They saw their talent would carry them straight to the top of the jockey colony and saw a green track at New York and are now in the top 5 jockeys in the country. 25 year old Irad Ortiz has an estimated net worth of $20 million. 24 year old Jose Ortiz has a net worth of $19 million. I would have given them a longshot chance 7/1 and up in their run to the top of the jockey colony at New York. After January 20th 2013 I would give them the stats they earned on their favorites, 3/5 what are the odds.

The Play:
Today at Aqueduct there are 10 races.  Irad and Jose Ortiz are named on 16.  As a horseplayer who likes to cherry pick, it’s difficult to pick from 16 so I chose 2.  Both plays are Jose Ortiz and trainer Linda Rice.

Race 5, the 9 horse, New Jersey John.  Ortiz and Rice have raced 80 times in route races at Aqueduct, hit the exacta 39 times for a 49% exacta rate.

Race 10, the 2 horse Seymourdini.  Ortiz and Rice in Stakes route races are 55-22-40%.

In Race 10, I’ll play the exacta with the 6 horse, Sharp Azteca.  The trainer is Jorge Navarro and Javier Castellano with Navarro are 31-18-58% in the exacta and in Stakes Races 10-7-70% in the exacta.


The reason I’m choosing these two plays is Jose is married to another very good jockey named Taylor Rice.  Taylor is the niece of Linda Rice and Linda Rice always speaks highly of both Jose and Irad and their abilities and because they are related by marriage, it’s pretty obvious that Linda Rice takes care of her family.